Peace on Earth ‘Tis The Season


Wishing all of you a peaceful, calm, happy weekend, with no arguments or debates. Let’s try not to say the T word for a couple of days. Let’s focus on the many things that bring us all together, not the differences that pull us apart.

Between now and Monday, we can’t stop the cruelty and madness in our country and the world, but we can control the way we treat each other. Let’s be kind, considerate and compassionate. Instead of watching pundits on television, go see a movie, a concert, watch cats and dogs videos, read a book, or just take a walk. All of you are good and kind people. We are all on the same team. Let’s act that way.

Posted in #leydenpride, East Leyden, Economic Development, Economy, Education, Elections, Employing Disabled, Food, Franklin Park, gambling, Leyden Area Special Education CoOp, Mayor Caiafa, Roy F. McCampbell, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Take Away Boundaries, and People Go Nuts


Many people have asked me, “What is world is going on here, with Roy Moore, John Conyers, Joe Barton, Al Franken, Matt Lauer, and all the others?”

I’ll tell you what is going on: moral truth is dead in America.

It’s been a long time coming, but the bill is coming due for the hip and  progressive sexual revolution in America. The sexual abuse and harassment sweepstakes we are witnessing today is the direct result of our society deciding that Christian morality is narrow, repressive, and above all, not cool.

Life is a house, and your marriage is the fireplace. Put sex anywhere in the house other than the fireplace, and you will burn it down.”

Guess what?

America is currently on fire.

Posted in Chicago, College, Crime, Economic Development, Economy, Education, Elections, Entertainment, Finance, Food, gambling, Illinois, political satire, politics, Rauner, Schiller Park Commentaries, Social Media, Sports, Union | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Was 13 an Unlucky Number for Congressman Luis V. Guitierrez ?


Guiterrez

Congressman Gutierrez has always been a contradiction in motion.   He has preached clean liberalism, yet he has been a captive of big interests.   In Congress he represents a District of Hispanic American citizens, yet is more anti-Yankee than Osama Bin Laden. He has preached self-determination for Puerto Rico, yet works every day in favor of colonial nationalism.   He invokes ethical supremacy, yet is the first to break the law in the name of moral superiority.

Is it merely possible that his 13th term has served to disclose he is an imposter and the biggest fraud in Congress ?   And that is why he has chosen not to run again ?

Or could it be something else that has not come out ?

Or could it be something that we already know and now the Feds are vitally interested !

Remember that Representative Luis Gutierrez has disbursed tens of thousands of dollars in campaign  funds to his wife this year, bringing her total compensation to more than $400,000 , since she first appeared on his campaign  payroll.

Members of Congress have been allowed to place family on their campaign’s payrolls since 2001, when then Representative Jesse Jackson asked the Federal Election Commission to issue an advisory opinion on the matter.  After the committee had approved the practice, Jackson went on to pay a firm owned by his wife hundreds of thousands of dollars from his own committee.    Jackson and his wife pleaded guilty in 2013 to using $750,000 in campaign funds for personal use.

Or maybe its Gutierrez’s ties to developer Boender, who has long been a political supporter of the Illinois congressman.   Rumors abound that Gutierrez has assisted Boender in getting lucrative zoning approvals for Chicago developments.

Gutierrez has and continues to have a multitude of legal and ethical problems.

The Democratic congressman’s financial relationships with some of his campaign contributors goes beyond campaign cash according to records.  In half a dozen deals with campaign supporters since 2002, Gutierrez has made about $421,000, by investing his money in real estate deals and exiting a short time later.   Gutierrez has bought and sold propeties with five campaign donors, including convicted political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko.

Gutierrez  is a career politician living on the taxpayer’s dime while using his office to personally enrich himself.

Congressman Gutierrez’s 13th term may have proven to be unlucky for him and his past legal and ethical problems may have caught up with him.   Only time will tell…………………

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Chicago, Crime, Economic Development, Economy, Education, Finance, Health, murder, Muslim, News, Taxation, Terrorists, Transportation, Union, War on Terror | Tagged | Leave a comment

Can Leyden Area Special Education CoOp (LASEC) Reinvent Themselves ? Or Is It Best That the CoOp Be Disbanded ?


On February 7, 2017, I wrote a blog article

Is Leyden Area Special Education CoOp (LASEC) Obsolete ?  Should Norwood Park Grammar Schools Withdraw From LASEC and Consolidate Special Education Services ?

questioning whether LASEC was obsolete and whether Norwood Park Grammar Schools should disband ?

Nine months later it has become clear that at least Norridge School District 80 and the Elmwood Park Unit District are now reviewing their future with LASEC

What is the Future of the Leyden Area Special Education CoOp (LASEC) ?l

 

LASEC after staunchly refusing to consider redefining their special education services when questioned by their members have begun to review what steps they need to take to survive, but not necessarily provide the best services for the special education students that they are tasked to serve.    Elmwood Park over a two year period asked on several occasions to have LASEC develop an opportunity for a le carte services, which were refused by the organization.     But now with such refusals behind them, LASEC must now consider what their members see as the proper path for the future of the organization.

In my last blog article,

https://royfmc.com/2017/11/21/what-is-the-future-of-the-leyden-area-special-education-coop-lasec/ ,

we followed the direction that both Norridge SD 80 and Elmwood Park Unit School District are taking as it comes to finances and restructuring the way special education services are delivered in their Districts.

Now LASEC has begin to consider alternative steps that they can take to retain their viability as an organization if they are forced by actions of their members to force the restructuring.

LASEC in the information attached has done an analysis of the costs under different scenarios Analysis of LASEC Costs to Member District Under Various Scenarios  .  This information is important because it also reveals that these funds may be put to a better use in the Norridge and Elmwood Park School Districts.     But this also raises questions of the ongoing viability for the remaining members and whether they also would be better off financially to cease being members.

But all of this acutely points to the fact that many of these Districts themselves should merge to save the taxpayers immensely and provide better coordinated services for the students that are enrolled in their respective schools.

 

 

Posted in #leydenpride, Autism, East Leyden, Education, Elmwood Park School District 401, Employing Disabled, Franklin Park, gambling, Harwood Heights, IEP, Illinois, Leyden, Leyden Area Special Education CoOp, Mannheim School District 83, Norridge, Norridge School D80, Pennoyer School District 79, political satire, Rosemont School District 78, Schiller Park, Schiller Park School District 81, Special Education, Union Ridge SD86, West Leyden | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What is the Future of the Leyden Area Special Education CoOp (LASEC) ?l


LASECDocFile (1)

LASEC filled a unique community need in Leyden and Norwood Park Townships over the last 50 years by working with teachers, school leaders, and member school districts to improve educational and support services for students with disabilities,  including the following school district members: Rosemont School District 78, Franklin Park School District 84, Leyden High School District 212, Pennoyer School District 79, Rhodes School District 84.5, Ridgewood Community High School District 234, Norridge School District 80, River Grove School District 85.5, Elmwood Park Community Unit School District 401, Mannheim School District 83, and Union Ridge School District 86

In 2007, Schiller Park School District 81 disagreed with the funding formulas for LASEC and decided to go it alone.  By 2008, Schiller Park School District 81 had disassociated from LASEC.

Now with the ongoing budget and funding crisis in the educational system of the State of Illinois, Norridge School District 80 has taken a leadership role in questioning the costs of LASEC and their ongoing benefits to the District.

At the October 10, 2017, Norridge SD 80 Board Meeting the Board adopted a resolutionNorridge School District 80 Resolution Regarding Special Education empowering the School Superintendent to investigate the special education services currently provided to the District and report/make recommendations to the Board of Education.  This investigation will include reviewing the costs of special education services provided inside  and outside the District to its students with IEP’s.    This process will include examining options for revising SD 80’s relationship with LASEC.

What has to be examined is whether money that currently is being used for administrative services for another organization would be better served providing services to District 80 students in amore inclusive manner within the District 80 classrooms.

In parallel, Elmwood Park CUSD #401 is also reviewing their ongoing relationship with LASEC Elmwood Park CUSD 401 Letter Regarding Internalizing Special Education Services and Personnel as they expand their Student Services Department.   SD401 is proceeding to take over certain functions of the Leyden Area Special Education CoOperative which in they past LASEC has performed.    SD 401 projects that currently are funding approximately $400,000 of LASEC’s administrative costs which they hope to return to SD401 to provide those funds as services directly to the Elmwood Park students.

As the time proceeds, both Districts are attempting to enter into a meaningful dialogue with LASEC to achieve a mutually satisfactory working relationship with LASEC while protecting the taxpayers dollars as well as making sure the maximum amount of funds are available for the students’ services with IEP’s.

Future posts will explore the impact upon other partner school’s remaining in the CoOp as these relationships are redefined.

Furthermore, it is important to enter into a discussion as to whether withdrawl from LASEC is beneficial to the students and not just the taxpayers.

Such success or failure of SD 81’s Special Education Program upon their withdrawl in 2008 will be further explored in future posts as well.

Posted in #leydenpride, Autism, Chicago, East Leyden, Education, Elmwood Park School District 401, Employing Disabled, Franklin Park, Harwood Heights, IEP, Illinoi, Illinois, LASEC, Leyden, Leyden Area Special Education CoOp, Mannheim School District 83, Norridge, Norridge School D80, Northlake, Pennoyer School District 79, politics, Rosemont School District 78, Roy F. McCampbell, Schiller Park, Schiller Park School District 81, schillerparkblog, Social Media, Special Education, Union Ridge SD86, West Leyden | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

In a recent guidance letter, the federal Office of Special Education Programs (“OSEP”) explained that a local educational agency (“LEA”) may not condition holding an IEP meeting on a parent’s attorney not participating or on the parent providing prior notice of its intent to invite the attorney. Letter to Andel, 116 LRP 8548 (February 17, 2016). In Letter to Andel, OSEP reiterated its longstanding position that the attendance of attorneys at IEP meetings “should be strongly discouraged” due to the potential for creating an adversarial atmosphere. Despite this position, OSEP pointed out that IDEA’s implementing regulations permit a parent or an LEA to invite to the IEP meeting individuals with special expertise regarding the child. However, while the regulations require the LEA to notify the parent in advance regarding who will attend an IEP meeting, there is no corresponding obligation on the part of the parent. OSEP stated that in the “spirit of cooperation,” the parent should inform the LEA ahead of time if he/she intends to bring an attorney. Often times, attorneys, as a matter of professional courtesy, will notify the LEA or its attorney if they intend on participating in an IEP meeting. However, there is nothing in the IDEA or its implementing regulations that would permit an LEA to conduct an IEP meeting on the condition that the parent’s attorney not participate. Therefore, when a parent unexpectedly brings his/her attorney to an IEP meeting, OSEP explained that it would be permissible for an LEA to reschedule the meeting to another date and time so that it could include its own attorney under the following circumstances: (1) the parent agrees to reschedule, and (2) the postponement does not result in a delay or denial of FAPE to the child.


Posted in IEP, Special Education, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

We Live In A Dangerous World; but Who Poses The Greatest Danger To Us and Our Fellow Citizens ?


Over a nearly two-year period, the last years of the Obama administration (FY2015 – FY2016), Homeland Security and the Department of Justice spent $138 million on new guns and ammunition. That seems reasonable.

What’s curious, however, is that traditionally administrative agencies spent more than $20 million. Four notable examples:

1) The 2,300 Special Agents at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are allowed to carry AR-15’s, P90 tactical rifles, and other heavy weaponry. Recently, the IRS armed up with $1.2 million in new ammunition. This was in addition to the $11 million procurement of guns, ammunition, and military-style equipment procured between 2006-2014.

2) The Small Business Administration (SBA) spent tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to load its gun locker with Glocks last year. The SBA wasn’t alone – the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service modified their Glocks with silencers.

3) The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a relatively new police force. In 1996, the VA had zero employees with arrest and firearm authority. Today, the VA has 3,700 officers, armed with millions of dollars’ worth of guns and ammunition including AR-15’s, Sig Sauer handguns, and semi-automatic pistols.

4) Meanwhile, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) agents carry the same sophisticated weapons platforms used by our Special Forces military warriors. The HHS gun locker is housed in a new “National Training Operations Center” – a facility at an undisclosed location within the DC beltway.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Tax Is “Canned”


It’s dead. Cook County Board unceremoniously repeals sweetened-beverage tax, 15 yes, 2 no. Effective December 1, 2017

#canthecookcountytax

Posted in Chicago, Illinois | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Can Illinois Governor Rauner Be Re-Elected ?



Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner lost an unprecedented battle with the “Springfield insiders” he once campaigned to dethrone when lawmakers approved a budget deal and $5 billion tax hike over his objections, and without the pro-business reforms the Republican promised for years.

Now the question is “whether the outcome of the more than two-year budget impasse will help or hurt the wealthy former businessman when he asks voters for a second term in 2018 ?”
Rauner, who last year deposited $50 million into his political fund, already was facing a particularly difficult re-election in a place where voters typically elect Democrats to statewide office. A growing list of Democratic contenders with access to equally massive campaign accounts have lined up to oppose him, and Democrats and other liberal groups nationally are spending money and calling him one of the country’s most vulnerable incumbent GOP governors.
Is it enough to say, ‘I worked hard for you. I couldn’t get it done, but keep me and I’ll keep working at it?’ Or does he look like an ineffectual bumbler that’s driven the state into the toilet?”

In my opinion the scenario that played out when lawmakers overrode his vetoes of the tax hike and spending plan could be a political gift for Rauner, who gets to take advantage of about $5 billion in new state revenue without having supported it.
Next week he’s expected to hold campaign-style events where he’ll portray himself as the defender of taxpayers and point blame for the stalemate and new tax hike at his chief political rival, longtime House Speaker Michael Madigan, who leads the Democratic Party of Illinois. Rauner also will have millions to do the same on television, and to link his rival to Madigan in campaign ads.
Mike Madigan is going to own the tax increase and it’s very difficult to win elections when your main accomplishment is you raised income taxes.
Rauner said throughout the impasse that he wouldn’t support an income tax increase to help balance the budget unless he got some changes to improve Illinois’ business climate and give other relief to taxpayers, such as a property tax freeze and reduced workers’ compensation insurance costs. Democrats resisted, saying his agenda items would hurt working people and that a property tax freeze would hurt school districts that rely on that revenue.
With the two sides unable to agree on a budget, the state continued to spend billions more than it was taking in, due to court orders and state law mandating some payments.
Illinois racked up about $15 billion in unpaid bills, college students left the state because of cuts to higher education and social service agencies were forced to cut programs and staff or close entirely. Illinois also saw its credit rating downgraded multiple times, and ratings agencies warned as the state entered its third fiscal year on July 1 without a budget that Illinois could be the first U.S. state to be lowered to “junk” status.

The mounting pressure prompted 15 Republicans in the House and one in the Senate to break ranks and vote with Democrats for a $36 billion spending plan that relies on a permanent income tax increase. Rauner vetoed the plan, but enough Republicans remained “yes” votes to help Democrats complete an override.
Among the more than half a dozen Democrats vying to challenger Rauner are billionaire businessman J.B. Pritzker, one of the country’s wealthiest men, and Chris Kennedy, the nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy.
On Friday, Pritzker’s campaign began automated phone calls to voters, which accuse Rauner of holding the state hostage for 736 days, causing “devastation” for Illinois families.
“It’s time Bruce Rauner was held accountable for the damage he’s inflicted on the people of Illinois,” says a woman in Pritzker’s recorded call who identifies herself as part of his campaign.
In my opinion the Illinois voters will not “buy” that argument.

What the voters will see in the next 18 months is a constant barrage from candidates spending millions of dollars to deliver their message with their own “spins” to the voters of Illinois.

Posted in Chicago, Crime, Economic Development, Economy, Education, Elections, Employing Disabled, Finance, foia, Franklin Park, Harwood Heights, Illinois, Illinois Pensions, Leyden, Mayor Caiafa, Norridge, Norridge School D80, Northern Illinois University, Northlake, O'Hare Noise, Pennoyer School District 79, politics, Rauner, Roy F. McCampbell, Schiller Park, Schiller Park School District 81, Social Media, Special Education, Taxation, Union Ridge SD86, West Leyden | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Local School Districts Have To Now Pay Some Additional Teacher Pension Costs


In conjunction with this week’s passage of a state budget for fiscal year 2018, the Illinois General Assembly approved a new law that significantly changes the Illinois Pension Code by creating an optional “Tier III” benefit structure and changing the way state government funds TRS. 
None of the Pension Code changes enacted on July 6 affect active Tier I members or retired members in any way. There are no changes to benefits, active member contributions or health insurance coverage for Tier I and retired members. There are no changes to Tier II except that these members will be able to switch to Tier III. 
The legislature did not extend the state’s income tax to retirement income. 
NEW TIER III BENEFIT STRUCTURE 

The law gives current Tier II members and future Tier II members – all new teachers – the option of joining a new “Tier III” retirement plan.

The optional Tier III “hybrid” retirement plan has two parts – a small life-long “defined benefit” (DB) pension and a “defined contribution” (DC) plan similar to a 401(k).

It is unknown at this time when Tier III will be available to members. Before Tier III can be implemented, the plan must be reviewed and approved by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. It is unknown how long that process may take. The TRS Board will establish the final implementation date of the Tier III plan.

For Tier III members, the full retirement age will be 67 years and the automatic annual increase (AAI) is the same as the Tier II AAI – one-half of the previous year’s consumer price index, not compounded.

The calculation for an initial pension under Tier III is Service Years multiplied by Final Average Salary multiplied by 1.25 percent. The Tier I and Tier II pension calculation is Service Years multiplied by FAS multiplied by 2.2 percent. 

CHANGES TO STATE FUNDING FOR TRS 

New laws enacted with the state budget are designed to reduce the amount of money TRS will receive in fiscal year 2018 – and in the near future – from state government in its annual contribution to TRS. It is expected that the original state contribution for TRS in fiscal year 2018 – $4.65 billion – will be recalculated. 
First, TRS must retroactively “smooth” the fiscal effect of any changes made in the TRS assumed rate of investment return over a period of five years. The “smoothing” applies to any assumption changes from 2012 on. 
Second, local school districts will pay more of the cost of a member’s pension if that member’s salary is equal to or greater than the governor’s statutory salary. The district will be responsible for paying the actuarial cost of the benefits earned on the portion of the member’s salary that exceeds the governor’s salary, currently $177,412.

Posted in East Leyden, Economy, Education, Finance, foia, Franklin Park, Harwood Heights, Illinois, Illinois Pensions, Leyden, minimum wage, Norridge, Norridge School D80, Northlake, Pennoyer School District 79, politics, Roy F. McCampbell, Schiller Park, Schiller Park School District 81, Social Media, Special Education, Taxation, Union Ridge SD86, West Leyden | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment