March 25th is Medal of Honor Day


More than 3,400 servicemen have been awarded America’s highest decoration since it was established 150 years ago. Here are some other fascinating and lesser-known details of the Medal of Honor.

America had almost no history of granting military citations for bravery prior to the outbreak of the Civil War. In fact, when a senior War Department official first suggested such a decoration in the opening months of the conflict, the Union army’s top general at the time, Winfield Scott, vetoed the idea arguing that such awards were un-American. After the aging general stepped down, navy secretary Gideon Welles revived the concept. President Lincoln also approved and the Medal of Honor was born.

The federal mint in Philadelphia struck the first 175 of the iconic bronze, inverted-star citations for the U.S. Navy. In early 1862, the award was widened to include army gallantry — 2,000 additional medals were soon ordered. Originally, the award was reserved for enlisted personnel and non-commissioned officers only, but in 1863, eligibility was expanded to include officers.

The first Medals of Honor ever awardedwent to six survivors of the Andrews’ Raidon March 25, 1863. The band of Union volunteers were famous for commandeering a rebel train in 1862 and driving it north across Georgia and into Tennessee ahead of pursuing Confederate cavalry while sabotaging railroad tracks and telegraph lines en route.

The Medal of Honor was the U.S. military’s only citation during the Civil War. More than 1,500 were handed out in the conflict — nearly half of all ever awarded. By way of comparison, a total of 124 were bestowed during World War One, while 464 were offered during the Second World War. Korea and Vietnam vets won 136 and 247 Medals of Honor respectively. The balance were distributed for outstanding conduct during various American military operations throughout the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries.

The Medal of Honor is awarded by the president in the name of the U.S. Congress. As of 1963, only American military personnel engaged in combat against an enemy of the United States are eligible for the decoration, and only then if the individual has “distinguished himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty.” Recipients can be recommended by superior officers or even nominated by Congress.

Winners of the Medal of Honor are entitledto a number of benefits including: a $1,259 monthly allowance along with a 10 percent military pension bonus, the right to a burial plot at Arlington National Cemetery, a lifetime standing invitation to all presidential inaugurations, various travel perks, permission to wear the medal with civilian clothes after discharge and even salutes from superior officers.

There have been nearly a dozen design variants of the medal since its creation, including one cross-style configuration. To this day, the army, navy and air force bestow different versions of the decoration.

Nineteen recipients have received more than one Medal of Honor. Five of these went to First World War veterans like Matej Kocak. The 35-year-old Slovakian-born marine won both navy and army versions of the citation posthumously for bravery on the Western Front in July, 1917.

Mary Edwards Walker is the only woman to have ever been awarded the decoration. The 39-year-old Oswego, New York native volunteered to serve as a surgeon during the Civil War. She treated the wounded after the battles of Bull Run, Fredericksburg and Chattanooga (and did so without pay!) A staunch abolitionist, Walker even volunteered to spy for the north and was captured by the Confederacy for espionage but later released. She is one of only eight civilians to have won the Medal of Honor.

Other civilian recipients of the citationinclude private scouts and Indian fighters like Billy DixonAmos Chapman and Buffalo Bill Cody. All of these civilian medals were later taken back by an act of Congress when more stringent requirements for the honour were established in 1917. Cody’s and Mary Edward Walker’s were restored in 1989 and 1977 respectively.

More than 900 Medals of Honor have been revoked – 864 of these were taken back from members of the 27th Maine regiment. In June of 1863, more than 300 volunteers to the unit were eligible for discharge following the expiration of their enlistment periods. Following entreaties from officers to remain in uniform, the soldiers agreed to stay to defend Washington D.C. during the Battle of Gettysburg in exchange for the coveted decoration. After the crisis, unit commanders were unsure exactly which men were promised medals, so they simply awarded the commendation to the whole company. Another 29 medals were later taken back from the ceremonial guards from President Lincoln’s funeral.

Charles Lindbergh was famously awarded the decoration for his 1927 trans-Atlantic flight. Although a member of the army reserves at the time, many in Congress protested his induction into the order because the aviator’s feat, considerable as it was, wasn’t combat-connected.

More than 800 non-Americans have won the Medal of Honor, including 65 Canadians. One of these recipients, Douglas Munro who served at the Battle of Guadalcanal, was also the first Coastguardsman to earn the medal.

Posted in American Military, Army Navy Game, gun, iraq, ISIS, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, marine, marines, Medal of Honor, political satire, politics, Putin, Roy F. McCampbell, Russia, senator durbin, Social Media, State of the Union, terrorist, Terrorists, Top 20 Political Satire Blogs in 2024, Ukraine, Ukrainia, Union, US Supreme Court, USCongress, vietnam, vietnam virtual wall, vietnam wall, vote, War on Terror, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Does This Act of Terror in Moscow Mean for Russia ?


This act of terror in Moscow has handed to Western intelligence, an enormous treasure trove of intelligence analytics.

Despite the ISIS-K claim to responsibility and the release to the internet of the video by them, Vladimir Putin insists this attack was ordered by the sovereign government of Ukraine. If ISIS-K had not been responsible, they would not have been able to release the video and claim responsibility. Yet the President of Russia dares to lie to his own people and the world while brutally using this heinous attack to justify further hypersonic missile attacks on Ukraine in the past 48 hours. This abrogation of international responsibility is criminal.

However, there are some interesting positives in this heinous story. Firstly, it suggests that Putin and his intelligence apparatus is unable to penetrate central Asian mercenary terrorist politics and groups. Moscow is blind, Putin is blind. Had they had access to their own independent intelligence, they would have understood the threat and been able to mitigate it. They did not understand the threat because they could not verify it, and because they don’t have the access or the relationships any longer.

This speaks volumes and is good news for Ukraine, Europe, NATO and Central Asia. Russia is quite blind to what is unfolding in their back yard. It also suggests that Putin thought he could sacrifice the men of Dagestan, Ingushetia, Kalmykia, and as far as Siberian Krasnoyarsk Krai on the fields of Ukraine without repercussion. Then there is the Russian failure in Syria which ignited the ISIS retribution that has only just begun.
Of strategic importance is that Putin appears to have lost the loyalty and confidence of the Central Asian republics, who are regularly and openly now protesting against the Kremin and war in Ukraine. His chickens are coming home to roost and will be roosting for decades.

Additionally, and perhaps most significantly, it suggests that the Kremlin has lost control over immigration and borders since ISIS-K operators were able to get into Russia from Tajikistan easily, undetected, with no credible intelligence from the Russian government apparatus to suggest to the contrary. Where did the weapons come from? Were they smuggled into Russia or does ISIS-K have a network in Russia to procure weapons internally? This useful act of terror has exposed that the Russian emperor has no clothes and is likely to soon freeze.
It has enormous implications for Russian security at every level. If ISIS-K can achieve this so easily – what else can be done and by whom to target this dangerous but ailing regime.? One thing is for sure – it can’t be soon enough and at least one terrorist group has declared that it will stop at nothing until it has destroyed the Putin regime.
With ISIS-K’s promise to continue targeting Russia, we can safely assume that the unravelling of Russia in central Asia has irreversibly begun. We are assured of Putin’s strategic unviability.

NO COUNTRY HAS BETTER intelligence on the Islamic State-Khorasan Province (known as ISIS-K) than the United States. American forces have faced ISIS-K almost from the moment the group was founded in 2015 in Pakistan, just a few miles from the Afghan border. It was there that a group of disaffected members of the Tehreek-e-Taliban-e-Pakistan (TTP, commonly referred to as the Pakistani Taliban) began turning their backs on al-Qaeda, which they saw as a failing brand, and joined the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Russia did not heed the warning and a tragedy happened to innocent concert goers.

Posted in Afghanistan, China, constitution, F 35, FBI, gangs, intelligence, iraq, ISIS, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, migrants, politics, Population, Putin, Religion, Roy F. McCampbell, Russia, Social Media, Tajikistan, terrorist, Terrorists, Top 20 Political Satire Blogs in 2024, Transportation, Ukrainia, War on Terror, weapon ban | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Northwestern University Ryan Field Memorabilia Available


Want a piece of Northwestern Athletics history? 🏟️
During demolition of Ryan Field, Northwestern has partnered with Rebuilding Exchange, an Evanston and Chicago-based nonprofit, to preserve pieces of the stadium for Wildcat fans, alumni and collectors:
https://bit.ly/3IscEDs

Stadium seats, seat backers, signage, banners, equipment, storage units and more can be purchased—all profits go to supporting the mission of Rebuilding Exchange.

Posted in College, Dyche Stadium, Evanston, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, Northwestern University, NUMB alum, Paynter, Roy F. McCampbell, Ryan Field | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The United States has just undergone its most substantial one-year population increase in history


The United States has just undergone its most substantial one-year population increase in history, with growth exceeding 3.8 million people in 2023, primarily attributed to illegal immigration, according to a recent report by John Burns Research and Consulting.

Under President Biden’s leadership, over 8 million people have entered the country illegally.

On Biden’s inaugural day, he signed executive orders that incentivize illegal immigration:

  • Paused Deportations
  • Suspended “Remain in Mexico”
  • Stopped Border Wall Construction

As the nation grapples with the rising costs linked to illegal immigration, major cities are making budget cuts to essential services such as fire, police, sanitation, libraries, and education.

Despite facing these domestic challenges, President Biden and Washington D.C. politicians are advocating for allocating an additional hundred billion dollars to protect foreign borders from distant invasions.

This situation exemplifies the “America Last” approach, wherein America and its citizens bear hardships and sacrifices, functioning as pawns on a geopolitical chessboard that primarily serves the interests of the elites.

Posted in Biden, blog, census, Crime, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, lobbying, marijuana, migrants, Muslim, News, Population, Pritzker, Putin, Roy F. McCampbell, Russia, SAFE-T Act, senator durbin, senator Mulroe, Social Media, terrorist, Terrorists, Top 20 Political Satire Blogs in 2024, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, Turkey, Ukraine, unconstitutional, US Supreme Court, USCongress, weed | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Where’s The Beef ?


“Where’s the Beef?” is arguably the most famous catchphrase concerning a fast food chain. Can you think of another that rivals Wendy’s ad from 1984?

There have been many iconic catchphrases from commercials over the years. But in the 1980s, one catchphrase ruled them all — “Where’s the Beef?” If you grew up during this time, you know how iconic this catchphrase was. It had a tremendous impact on pop culture throughout the decade and beyond. It would be repeated everywhere and made Clara Peller — the woman who uttered the phrase — world famous.

The phrase “Where’s the Beef” continued to grow and would be used to question things such as ideas, events, or products as to if they had any substance.

In the mid 1980s, McDonald’s and Burger King were leaders of the fast-food burger market, and they promoted the size of their burgers with products like the “Big Mac” and the “Whopper.”

Wendy’s didn’t have any specific “big-name” type burger, and most of their products were single patty burgers. But they contained more meat than they believed people realized.

They wanted to showcase that their hamburger had more beef and that McDonald’s and Burger King were hiding their lack of meat by using larger buns. Wendy’s wanted to call them out for these tactics while showcasing that they had more beef.

First airing in 1984, the original commercial featured three elderly ladies at the “Home of the Big Bun” examining an exaggeratedly large hamburger bun. The other two ladies poked at it, exchanging bemused comments (“It certainly is a big bun. It’s a very big bun. It’s a big fluffy bun. It’s a very big fluffy bun”). As one of the ladies lift the top half of the bun, a comically minuscule hamburger patty with cheese and a pickle is revealed (prompting her to finish the sentence “—bun.” with a much more disappointed tone). Peller immediately responds with her outraged, irascible question.

Sequels featured Peller yelling at a Fluffy Bun executive from his yacht over the phone and approaching fast food drive-up windows (including the “Home of the Big Bun” and a restaurant with a golden arch) that were slammed down before she could complete the line.

The advertising campaign ended in 1985 after Peller performed in a commercial for Prego pasta sauce, saying “I found it, I really found it”, a phrase alluding to the beef in the listener’s mind.

Posted in Illinois, illinois politics, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, political satire, pork, Roy F. McCampbell, Social Media, Top 20 Political Satire Blogs in 2024, top 30 blog, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, where’s the beef | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Roy F McCampbell’s Blog is Named to the 20 Best Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2024


Roy F. McCampbell is an Attorney, Special Ed Advocate, Speaker and Author. He started a blog so everyone can read his thoughts and observations, ending conjecture. Sarcasm and Silliness by a Resident of Leyden Township. This year he was rated number 5 in the top 20

Here are 20 Best Political Satire Blogs you should follow in 2023

https://politics.feedspot.com/political_satire_blogs/

Posted in cook county, Crime, Entertainment, Hey Jackass, Illinois, illinois politics, John Kass, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, Leyden, lobbying, mental health, political satire, politics, Roy F. McCampbell, Social Media, Top 20 Political Satire Blogs in 2024, top 30 blog, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites in 2021 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can You Fail a Drug Test from Secondhand Marijuana Smoke?


You may have thought it was a cannabis urban legend, but there actually is scientific evidence that you could fail a drug test because of secondhand weed smoke.

Don’t panic, but it is actually possible to fail a drug test because of secondhand marijuana smoke, according to the evidence from more than a dozen research papers. That doesn’t mean if you walk through a cloud of marijuana smoke at a concert or stroll through a backyard BBQ that you’ll fail a urine test, but it’s probably a good idea to be wary. 

And considering that smoking is the most common method of consuming cannabis, it’s worth asking: What are the effects of cannabis smoke on those who aren’t actually smoking? 

The answer isn’t as clear-cut as one might hope. 

How can secondhand marijuana smoke show up in a urine test?

So how does secondhand pot smoke show up in a urine test? 

According to a 2017 review of 15 existing research papers, exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke resulted in the presence of cannabinoid metabolites in bodily fluids, specifically in the saliva, blood, and urine. The authors of the review also suggested that higher THC content of the smoked marijuana is correlated with higher the THC metabolite content in the urine.

So yes, is it possible to fail a drug test without smoking — just from secondhand exposure to cannabis smoke. 

“Using levels of cannabinoid or THC metabolites found in blood or urine samples to determine marijuana use or intoxication is challenging,” the researchers wrote. “There is no universal threshold that can differentiate between those who have actively smoked marijuana and are intoxicated, those who have actively smoked marijuana in the past and those who have been exposed to second-hand smoke.” 

In other words, you could potentially fail a drug test due to secondhand smoke and the technicians performing the test would be unable to tell whether or not your exposure to THC was due to secondhand smoke or actively smoking marijuana. 

And secondhand smoke doesn’t necessarily cause only small or trace amounts of exposure. According to the researchers, some of the people who were exposed to secondhand marijuana smoke in some of the research had THC metabolite levels higher than those legally allowed for motor vehicle drivers in a number of jurisdictions. 

“This raises questions about whether there should be tolerance for people who claim that their positive urine test result is due to second-hand exposure,” the researchers wrote. 
Drug testing, of course, is also impacted by how long THC stays in your system.

The 3 main types of cannabis drug testing include:

  • Urine testing
  • Hair follicle testing
  • Saliva testing

What does a urine test indicate?

Urine tests for marijuana are designed to find tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the main intoxicating ingredient in cannabis, as well as the metabolite THC-COOH, which is produced when the body breaks down THC. 

A positive result typically entails more than 50 nanograms of THC per milliliter, though this isn’t always the case. In 2019, the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) increased the THC testing threshold for student athletes from 15 to 35 nanograms per milliliter, from the previous threshold of 5 to 15 nanograms. And in 2020, the National Football League increased the allowed amount of THC in urine tests from 35 to 150 nanograms per milliliter. 

How long is THC detectable in urine?

It’s commonly-known that you can fail a urine test for THC even weeks after smoking. This is because THC is fat soluble, which makes cannabis great for infusing oil or butter, but also means that it can stay detectable in your urine for as much as around a month because it is stored in fat cells. And if you’re taking a hair follicle test THC can be detectable for up to 90 days

But the good news for those who just got exposed to a little secondhand weed smoke? It depends a great deal on how much THC you are exposed to or consume and how often it happens. 

According to the Mayo Clinic, THC can be detectable in the urine of chronic users for more than 30 days, while “single exposure to marijuana in nonusers typically can be detected in the urine only up to 72 hours,” the Mayo Clinic states. 

In other words, even if you were exposed to a thick cloud of secondhand marijuana smoke, you probably don’t need to worry about a drug test next week. 

Hair follicle testing for marijuana 

Hair follicle testing involves taking a 100-milligram sample of hair (around 90 to 120 strands) which is removed at the scalp. In addition to THC, hair follicle testing can detect a wide variety of drugs including cocaine, opiates, and amphetamines among others.   

The main difference between hair follicle and urine testing is that drugs can be detected in hair follicles for up to 90 days after use and samples are less likely to be adulterated or contaminated during collection. 

The good news is that you’re significantly less likely to be given a hair follicle test for a job interview or as a condition of deferred adjudication. The tests also were found to have a high potential for “under-identification of low-frequency use,” according to a 2014 study.

Saliva testing for marijuana 

Saliva tests are used to detect the presence of THC, not its metabolites, and are administered by way of a mouth swab. They are much less invasive and easier to administer than urine or hair follicle tests, and can be a popular method of testing in the workplace. 

The good news is that for the casual smoker — and potentially even more so for the secondhand smoker — saliva tests can only detect the presence of THC for a few days. Chronic smokers, though, can fail saliva tests for around a month after smoking. 

Is exposure to secondhand smoke worse indoors or outdoors?

In a poorly ventilated room, marijuana smoke can linger in the air longer, increasing the level of exposure. This is actually true for any type of smoke. Indoors, the concentration of the chemicals, compounds, and particles in any type of smoke is higher, and it doesn’t clear out nearly as quickly as it does outdoors. 

The bottom line, if you’re in an environment where people are smoking, you’ll be less exposed for less time if you’re outside. 

Can you get high from secondhand smoke? 

The “contact high” is a staple of cannabis lore. It typically entails someone who finds themself in a room where joints are being passed at a rapid clip, and feels a secondhand high even though they didn’t partake. 

While in some cases this may be something of a placebo effect, there is some scientific evidence to back up the cannabis urban legend of a contact high. 

In the 2017 review, researchers found that the psychoactive effects they observed were also present in those exposed to secondhand cannabis smoke, although weaker than for those actually smoking it. The researchers also stated that there was a correlation between the intoxicating effects of THC from secondhand exposure and the strength of the cannabis strain involved.  

However, the researchers stressed that many of the scenarios that were observed took place in closed areas with limited ventilation and they probably don’t apply as much to more common scenarios like smoking outside.

Is secondhand cannabis smoke or vapor dangerous? 

A 2019 study published in Preventive Medicine Reports was the first of its kind to examine the effect of indoor secondhand cannabis smoke on child health. Researchers placed air particle monitors in 298 family homes across San Diego County, CA and examined how particulate material data impacted children’s health. 

The study found an association between indoor cannabis smoking and adverse health outcomes in children, including ear infections, asthma, other respiratory dysfunction, and skin conditions, but the association was not statistically significant. 

The research also suggests that the act of combustion and smoke produced, rather than what material is being smoked, poses the greatest health threat.

Very little research on the topic has been done, however. 

Vaporizing, on the other hand, does not involve combustion. So is it safer?

Non-combustible forms of cannabis “may be associated with lower relative harm both for users and for those who are exposed to the aerosol vapor” compared to those exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke, wrote the authors of a 2018 study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

“While there is currently less evidence on the health effects of exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke, cannabis smoke is similar in chemical composition to tobacco smoke (although in varying concentrations),” they wrote. 

There are currently no scientific studies on the long-term health effects of exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke, vapor, or other products. With more cannabis products on the market, that gap needs to be filled in order to properly assess and address the public health concerns involved.

Posted in #420day, #mentalhealthmonth, cannabis, cocaine, Crime, e cigarettes, gangs, health risk, Illinois, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, liability, marijuana, Medical, medical marijuana, mental health, morphine, needle exchange, politics, Roy F. McCampbell, SAFE-T Act, sanctions, search warrant, Social Media, student discipline, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, unconstitutional, US Supreme Court, USCongress, vaping, weed | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Illinois laws usher in policy changes in health care, employment, policing


At the stroke of midnight on New Year’s Eve, Illinoisans will see more than 300 new laws take effect – with changes that impact the state’s healthcare, public safety and employment sectors.

The Paid Leave for All Workers Act will require most employers to provide their workers with at least 40 hours of annual paid leave. And minimum wages will increase from $13 to $14 per hour.

Illinois Legal Aid Online offers online support for some of the state’s underserved residents. Executive Director Teri Ross said she understands many will want to know how the new laws affect them.

“We take the legislation, which is often difficult to read and somewhat opaque, and we translate that into a plain language explanation,” said Ross, “and in some cases, into some tools that people can use to assert their rights and to understand their rights.”

Under a new Telehealth Services law, Illinois mental-health and substance-use patients will continue to receive telehealth coverage for treatment.

And a patient’s medical care cannot be delayed while a hospital staffer verifies their payment method or insurance status.

Ross said hospitals will also be required to screen uninsured or underinsured patients for public financial assistance eligibility before their bill is sent to collections.

Another new law on the books has stirred up concerns about immigrants applying for jobs in public safety.

It allows a person who is not a citizen – but is legally authorized to work in the U.S. – to apply to become an Illinois police officer.

Ross said low numbers on police forces are due to veteran officers retiring and a lack of new applicants – and claimed policing overall needs to change.

“One of the problems that we have, in our society generally,” said Ross, “is that law enforcement has been focused on communities of color, and is often not made up of people who are of color.”

Applicants who are non-citizens and possess a green card that allows them to live and work in the U.S. must be authorized under federal law to obtain, carry, purchase or otherwise possess a firearm.

 Illinois is set to have several new laws go on the books starting in 2024, with several of those affecting prisoners throughout the state. 

One of the measures taking effect in 2024 is Senate Bill 423, which supports the reintegration of individuals into the community while aiming to lower the possibility of recidivism and increase public safety.

Senate Bill 2073 allows those sentenced to life in prison while under the age of 21 to become eligible for parole review.

Another going into effect has to do with the resentencing of prisoners, according to Jenny Vollen Katz of the John Howard Association. 

null

“One is around the earned program sentencing credits and that they are going to apply retroactively,” Vollen Katz told The Center Square. “I know there is still conversation on how they will implement that law.” 

The law will give prisoners time-off credits for participating in programs. 

“What it does is make up for time where people were not getting those credits but participating in activities or a job that would earn them sentencing credits at different points in time,” Vollen Katz said. “So I think sort of making people whole.” 

Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed SB243 back in July and explained his hopes for the law through a statement. 

“It’s a system that is evidence-based and transparent, which is just what our families and neighborhoods deserve,” Pritzker said. “This bill speaks to the promise of Illinois. A promise of equity, empathy, public safety and true justice.”

Cook County will also be making changes as a new program will offer state ID cards for those who are finishing up their jail sentence in Cook County jail with the aim to help those who have recently been released with job searches, opening bank accounts, and buying a home or car.

The program is spearheaded by Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, who said it will help recently released people get a start on reentering society.

“For those who have been incarcerated, access to a home, a job, and a doctor is commonly impeded by unfair barriers,” Giannoulias said. “Each is crucial for a successful reentry back into society, and that access starts with a small but significant item that many of us take for granted, the state-issued identification card.”

New Illinois Laws:

  1. Hiking minimum wage for tipped workers, such as restaurant employees, to $9hr.
  2. All employees will receive up to 40 hours of paid time off each yr (1hr for each hr worked).

Measures will go into effect in 2024.

https://www.dailyherald.com/20231228/illinois-state-politics/more-than-300-new-laws-take-effect-jan-1-in-illinois-heres-a-look-at-some-of-them/

Posted in #taxation, assault weapon, Auto Theft, Bradley Stephens, cannabis, cash bail, Chicago, chicago pd, chokeholds, constitution, cook county, Crime, domestic violence, Economy, Education, Elections, eviction, foia, Foxx, Franklin Park, gangs, garbage, gasoline, gun, gun control, Health, Illinois, Illinois marriage and Dissolution Act, Illinois Pensions, illinois politics, infrastructure, Kim Foxx, Kwame Raoul, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, liability, lobbying, marijuana, Medical, mental health, meth, needle exchange, New Years, News, police, police reform, politics, Pritzker, privacy, quarantine, referendum, Rep Welch, rioting, robbed, Rosemont, Roy F. McCampbell, SAFE-T Act, sanctions, senator durbin, sexual assault, sexual harrassment, sexually transmitted disease, Social Media, social security, Special Education, Sports, state representative, student discipline, Taxation, theft, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, unconstitutional, US Supreme Court, USCongress, weed | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Do Policemen Touch Your Tail Light When They Pull You Over?


Whether or not you have ever been pulled over in your vehicle by a police officer, you have probably wondered about this age-old strategy: policemen touching tail lights when they pull you over. This occurs when a police officer gets out of his or her vehicle and approaches yours, but rather than heading straight to your window, the policeman will touch your tail light first.

Rest assured this practice is completely legal and common, dating back decades — at first being implemented to mitigate the risk that police officers are often exposed to when practicing traffic law. So why do cops touch tail lights, exactly?

Why Do Cops Touch Your Tail Light?

While most times a police officer approaches a vehicle, nothing out of the ordinary will happen. But, there is always the risk of danger, especially with violence against police increasing each year. Police need to be able to examine a vehicle quickly before approaching it, and touching/tapping a tail light can tell cops a lot about the person being pulled over.

For instance, this tactic can give the officer an idea of the driver’s mental state. Did the driver get startled when the officer touched the tail light, or were they too distracted by something else? Are they driving under the influence or hiding a weapon? These are questions officers must consider in the moments before approaching the driver. And while there are several theories about why cops touch your tail light, here are a few of the most common reasons.

1. To Startle the Driver

Inevitably, police officers are going to run into unsafe situations when they pull people over. Sometimes drivers will have illegal substances or prohibited items in their cars like guns, ammunition, or drugs. Naturally, if the driver does have something illegal in the vehicle, he or she will want to hide it before the officer approaches the window.

So, one of the reasons why cops touch tail lights is to startle the person inside. The driver is likely not expecting the noise of the tap, which typically causes him or her to stop for a moment, giving the police officer additional time to witness what the driver is trying to hide (if there is anything).

The continuous practice of this surprise tactic has proven:

  1. To increase the arrest of intoxicated drivers
  2. To increase the arrest of sellers of prohibited substances
  3. To increase the arrest of people found in possession of unlicensed firearms
  4. Other road-related offenses

However, the practice of touching the tail light of vehicles can put our police officers in a risky situation. This is because this practice exposes the police officer’s position making him or her susceptible to attack.

2. To Leave Evidence

Originally, another reason why cops touch tail lights was to leave their fingerprints on the vehicle. In case the officer found himself in a dangerous situation while pulling over the subject vehicle, fingerprint evidence would prove that he or she was present at the scene. The fingerprints would only be utilized if the interaction between the driver and the cop led to a criminal investigation, like a car accident or shooting.

However, this isn’t always a surefire way to help an investigation some since the fingerprints can be smudged or tampered with, as well as washed away by rain or snow. More often than not, there are better ways for police to obtain evidence from a vehicular crime scene than the fingerprints on the car.

3. To Make Sure the Trunk Is Latched

Police officers put their lives at risk everyday on the job and must be prepared for danger and violence to arise at any moment. While tapping a tail light may startle a driver and leave evidence on the vehicle, there is another tactic cops use. If the police officer believes they are in a dangerous situation as they pull you over, they may touch the backend of your vehicle on the way to your window to make sure the trunk is latched. It might sound bizarre, but this tactic ensures that no one is hiding in the trunk and could pop out.

If a police officer does check that your trunk is shut, they will typically have their partner with them. One officer will check the trunk, while the other approaches your window. This is to ensure the safety of the officers and make sure the driver is not able to get away with hiding anything or obtaining a weapon while the officer is checking the trunk.

Do Cops Still Touch Tail Lights?

Due to the rampant crimes that happen on the road, officers are exposed to greater danger than in the past. In lieu of this practice, our law enforcers, instead, have adopted new technology in implementing traffic rules.

Now, there are security cameras installed on almost every corner of the road, and it’s standard for all cops to have dash or body cams recording live video of the vehicle and every interaction that happens between the driver and the officer, eliminating the original reason tail tapping was ever implemented.

Some police departments still instruct their officers to leave some form of fingerprint evidence on the car, but it does not have to be a tail light. If you get pulled over and the officer still touches your tail light, it’s likely out of habit rather than necessity.

Is It Safe for a Cop to Touch Your Tail Light?

Cops touching your tail light as they pull you over seems like an innocent strategy, but is it actually compromising their safety? With violence against police happening more often than ever, tail light tapping could cause officers to be in danger. F

or instance, some police departments will instruct their officers not to touch tail lights at all, while others tell them to only touch the side of the vehicle, not the very back. Touching the tail light could put the officer right behind the vehicle, which would put them at risk of being hurt if the driver puts the car in reverse. As morbid as it sounds, these things happen, and officers must always be prepared for the worst as they approach any vehicle.

To learn more about traffic law, check out what happens when you get pulled over without a driver’s license.

Do You Need Help With a Traffic Incident?

If you’ve been pulled over by the cops and have questions about a ticket you received, get a free case evaluation by a local attorney to learn about your options.

Disclaimer

This article contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. The Law Dictionary is not a law firm, and this page does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult with me, Roy F McCampbell at 708-878-7957 or my website at https://attorneymccampbell.com/

Recent Traffic Violations Articles

How to Register a Vehicle Without a Title

What Is Double Parking?

Where Can I Get a Photo ID Besides the DMV?

What Does a Flashing Red Light Mean

How to Check If a License Is Suspended Online

What Happens When You Get Pulled Over Without a Driver’s License?

Why Do Policemen Touch Your Tail Light When They Pull You Over?

How To Find A Lost Traffic Citation Number

How Does A Restricted License Work?

How To Get A Handicap Parking Permit

Posted in camera, Car Jacking, cash bail, chicago pd, chokeholds, Crime, FBI, Kim Foxx, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, liability, marijuana, Minneapolis PD, New Years, police, police reform, politics, rioting, robbed, Roy F. McCampbell, SAFE-T Act, search warrant, security camera, Smollett, Social Media, theft, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, traffic ticket, unconstitutional, US Supreme Court, USCongress, weapon ban, weed | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

There’s more to Hinsdale basketball suit than just the headlines


The whole situation goes deeper than just a seemingly entitled kid being cut from his varsity basketball team

— Read on deadspin.com/hindsale-basketball-lawsuit-headlines-brendan-savage-1851054880

Posted in blog, College, Education, Illinois, illinois politics, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, liability, litigation funding, politics, Roy F. McCampbell, sanctions, Social Media, student discipline, Top 30 Political Satire Blogs and Websites for 2023, US Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment