The Renaming Game, Who Started It ?


I have to admit, I’m enjoying the outrage over Lake Ontario being renamed Lake America.

For years, we were told that names matter. Names carry meaning. Names make statements about who we are and what we value. Whenever some old name offended the political sensibilities of the moment, changing it wasn’t treated merely as permissible. It was regularly celebrated as an act of moral courage.

The Biden administration changed the federal names of hundreds of geographic features because the existing names contained a term it considered derogatory. The Pentagon renamed military installations across the South. Fort Bragg became Fort Liberty. Fort Hood became Fort Cavazos. Fort Benning became Fort Moore. Fort Polk became Fort Johnson.

Nobody told us names were sacred then.

Princeton removed Woodrow Wilson’s name from its School of Public and International Affairs. Yale removed John C. Calhoun’s name from one of its residential colleges. The Cleveland Indians became the Guardians. The Washington Redskins disappeared and eventually became the Commanders. Aunt Jemima became Pearl Milling Company. Uncle Ben became Ben’s Original.

Even mountains weren’t immune. In 2015, the Obama administration officially changed the name of Mount McKinley to Denali for federal purposes.

And through it all, we were told pretty much the same thing. That language evolves. Culture changes. Names are symbols. If a name no longer represents our values, change it.

Fair enough.

But apparently that rule came with an asterisk.

Donald Trump changes Lake Ontario to Lake America for purposes of the United States government, and suddenly everybody discovers an almost religious devotion to historical nomenclature. Now we’re told the old name is centuries old and carries historical importance. So did plenty of the names they wanted changed. Now we’re told renaming something is unnecessary, provocative, and political.

Welcome to the last decade.

But that really isn’t the point.

The point is that the people now acting horrified by politically motivated renaming helped create the age of politically motivated renaming. They spent years teaching us that names aren’t merely descriptions. They’re declarations. They told us government has every right to reconsider the names it uses, and that changing an old name can say something important about the values of the present generation.

Trump apparently listened.

The difference is that instead of renaming something because America should be embarrassed by its past, he renamed something because he thinks America ought to be proud of itself. And I suspect that’s what bothers some of his critics more than the name itself.

For years, the approved direction of travel was away from old American names, old American heroes, and old American traditions whenever somebody found them insufficiently enlightened. Trump went the other direction.

And it’s driving the liberals crazy.

Is it necessary? Probably not. Is it subtle? Not remotely. Is it quintessentially Trump? Absolutely.

But spare me the argument that renaming things for political or cultural reasons is some shocking new violation of American tradition.

That ship sailed a long time ago.

They just never expected Trump to climb aboard.

Unknown's avatar

About royfmc

BS in Environmental Engineering from Northwestern University's McCormick College of Engineering MBA from DePaul University's Kellstadt's College of Business JD from DePaul University's College of Law Website: www.attorneymccampbell.com
This entry was posted in campaign, Canada, cash, Deport, Illinois, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, liability, lobbying, New York, News, politics, Population, Trump, unconstitutional, Union, US Supreme Court, USCongress and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment