Zero Bail Policies Result in More Crime Victims According to a California Study


Jeff Reisig’s office, California District Attorney just completed a study on the comparative impacts of court-ordered Zero Bail ($0 Bail) over a 13 month period in my county.

The results were staggering. Zero bail releases resulted in 163% more crime and 200% more violent crime when compared to arrestees who were released after posting bail for similar crimes. As a result of Zero Bail policies, more victims were murdered, shot, robbed, assaulted, and beaten. This study is the first of its kind in California. https://lnkd.in/gKkWB9K2

Unknown's avatar

About royfmc

BS in Environmental Engineering from Northwestern University's McCormick College of Engineering MBA from DePaul University's Kellstadt's College of Business JD from DePaul University's College of Law Website: www.attorneymccampbell.com
This entry was posted in #mentalhealthmonth, Bradley Stephens, chokeholds, Crime, Foxx, gangs, Illinois, illinois politics, Kim Foxx, Kwame Raoul, Latin Kings, law, Law Offices of Roy F McCampbell, legal services, police, police reform, politics, Pritzker, Rep Welch, rioting, robbed, Roy F. McCampbell, SAFE-T Act, Smollett, Terrorists, unconstitutional, US Supreme Court, USCongress, vaping, weapon ban and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Zero Bail Policies Result in More Crime Victims According to a California Study

  1. John Locke's avatar John Locke says:

    Very interesting and I was only made aware of it by this post! I wanted to use the opportunity to practice my statistical analysis literacy and looked into the link you provided which led to 2 studies that showed, yes zero bail release was a potential factor in rearrest.
    But I noticed that they didn’t compare the crime rate overall during Covid (therefore, during the zero bail policy) with pre-Covid crime rates; that might sound like a nitpick but to put it another way the studies lacked a control group.
    Looking for more complete data I found that crime during Covid substantially decreased compared to the control years (2014-2016). This meant that regardless of the increase in rearrest, crime overall dropped. Pretrial detention significantly dropped obviously- translating to less tax payer money being spent on detaining yet-to-be-tried (by definition, innocent) jail inmates.
    There’s a 2017 study I saw that longer pretrial detention in individuals later found not guilty correlated with life long increased risk of that individual being a habitual offender.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment