OUTRAGED: Justice Samuel Alito EXPLODES after Supreme Court dismisses case against Biden’s White House pressuring social media companies to censor what they deemed disinformation during COVID and the 2020 election, says America might regret the decision, says, White House pressure “Cannot Be Dismissed as Mere Persuasion.”

In dissenting, Justice Alito was joined by Justices Thomas and Gorsuch

Alito penned a withering dissent in the Murthy case in stark contrast to the bewildering majority opinion in which Coney Barrett seems to contend there is some benign coercion exception to the federal govt violating the 1st Amendment. The naivete expressed by the majority as to what the government was doing is galactic in scope. One of the worst decisions in recent memory. A terrible day for fans of living in a free society.

NOTE: Justice Alito expressed significant concern about the extent of government influence on social media platforms, emphasizing that the interactions went beyond mere encouragement and ventured into coercion.

“The Government’s pressure tactics, which included threats of adverse regulatory action, cannot be dismissed as mere persuasion.”

NOTE: The dissent argued that the majority mischaracterized the plaintiffs’ standing, asserting that the connection between government actions and social media censorship was sufficiently established.

“The majority’s demand for concrete evidence of causation in each instance of censorship overlooks the broader pattern of government pressure and its chilling effect on free speech.”

NOTE: The dissent emphasized the potential chilling effect of government actions on free speech, warning that the ruling could embolden future government efforts to suppress dissenting views.

“This ruling effectively grants the government a free pass to continue its campaign of suppression, threatening the foundational principles of free expression.”

NOTE: Justice Alito argued that judicial intervention is necessary to prevent further government overreach in influencing social media moderation policies.

“Judicial oversight is imperative to safeguard against the encroachment of government on the marketplace of ideas.”

NOTE: The dissent highlighted ongoing evidence of government influence over social media platforms, pointing to continued communications and pressure tactics.

“The record is replete with instances of continued government engagement with social media companies, underscoring the persistent nature of the coercion.”